Why are therapy lights so expensive?

Last Updated: 03.07.2025 05:32

Why are therapy lights so expensive?

3-year warranty, 60-day satisfaction guarantee

Yes, there’s a huge difference in total number of LEDs, but to put it in context, the Solawave has about five and this bulb has 12. The ones on this bulb are BIG. It casts light on my entire face when I’m up close.

It has the very close technical specifications to the Omniluxe (Bulb 650 nm 850 ni, Omniluxe 630 nm 830 ni) MINUS the number of lights

Coco Gauff tops Aryna Sabalenka to give the French Open an American champion - The Washington Post

Pros:

Hope this helps others :)

Hooga is a reputable Red Light seller

Final AIDS/LifeCycle Travels Through Santa Barbara County - Noozhawk

After a ton of research, I decided to buy the “Hooga HG24 bulb” with the cord and I also purchased a stand separately. Grand total: $60.

Comes with eye guards

Number of lights (bulb: 12, Omniluxe 60)

VMware drops the lowest tier of its partner program – except in Europe - theregister.com

Slightly less convenient for facial use since it doesn’t conform to your face and you have to be somewhat stationary with the bulb.

Comes with a cord attached so it’s basically its own complete lamp when you buy the stand

It’s AFFORDABLE at just $40 for the bulb+cord+power switch itself

California Lawmakers Officially Secure $750M Annually For Film & TV Tax Credit Program With Final Budget Vote - Deadline

It has its pros and cons but the pros vastly outweigh the cons in my opinion…

I’ve been in the market for a red light therapy device and, like many of you, I’m dismayed by the pricing on every product that’s actually legitimate.

Cons:

Tourists break crystal-covered chair at Italian museum: "Every museum's nightmare has come true" - CBS News

You can shine the bulb anywhere on your body (beauty-specific masks are limiting). I’ll be treating my face as well as my alopecia areata on the top of my head.

It’s approved by the FDA as level II medical device (reminder, this means the FDA endorses it as safe, not that they are vouching for its efficacy)